🖐 WTO | dispute settlement - Disputes by short title

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🔥

Filter:
Sort:
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

has been targeted by a WTO complaint and directed against the complainant's interests. For instance, most LDCs are receiving foreign aid from developed.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Complainant: Turkey Consultations Complainant: European Union Complainant: United States Complainant: Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

The DSU sometimes refers to the Member bringing the dispute as the “​complaining party” or the “complainant” (this guide mostly uses the term “​complainant”).


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

The DSU sometimes refers to the Member bringing the dispute as the “​complaining party” or the “complainant” (this guide mostly uses the term “​complainant”).


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

has been targeted by a WTO complaint and directed against the complainant's interests. For instance, most LDCs are receiving foreign aid from developed.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

WTO disputes. Listen Australia as a complaining party (complainant) The WTO Dispute Settlement Body established a panel on 15 August


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

The complainant state brings the dispute to the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body (​DSB). A panel is established by the DSB that hears arguments.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

WTO disputes. Listen Australia as a complaining party (complainant) The WTO Dispute Settlement Body established a panel on 15 August


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

to the WTO (the complainant) sets out its objections to the trade measure(s) of another member government (the defendant). The two sides are then required to​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

to the WTO (the complainant) sets out its objections to the trade measure(s) of another member government (the defendant). The two sides are then required to​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
wto complainant

On 29 February , the Russian Federation requested the establishment of a panel. Australia delivered its third party written submission on 14 November , provided an oral statement on 23 January , and submitted an executive summary and responses to questions on 13 February On 4 April , Brazil requested consultations with Indonesia regarding certain measures imposed by Indonesia on the importation of meat from cattle of the species Bos taurus. A panel was established on 28 October and composed 9 December Australia delivered a third party oral submission on 6 October and submitted an executive summary of its third party oral submission and responses to panel questions on 27 October The panel report was circulated to Members on 18 August While the claims against Indonesia's specific duty were premised on it constituting a "safeguard measure", the Panel found the duty was not a safeguard measure within the meaning of Article I of the Agreement on Safeguards. Australia reserved its third party rights. Australia requested consultations with India concerning measures maintained by the Government of India, and several Indian states, that support Indian producers of sugarcane and sugar. At its meeting on 25 January , the DSB established a panel. On 19 December , the European Union requested consultations with the United States with respect to conditional tax incentives established by the State of Washington in relation to the development, manufacture, and sale of large civil aircraft. On 28 September , Indonesia filed its appeal of the Panel's decision. At its meeting on 28 September , the DSB established a panel. On 11 February , the United States requested consultations with China with regard to certain measures providing subsidies contingent upon export performance to enterprises in several industries in China. On 9 December the panel was composed. On 30 September , Australia requested to join the consultations. A panel was established on 29 August at the request of the Philippines. These measures comprise domestic support, including price support, and export subsidies. On 2 October , the United States made a second request for consultations on an updated list of measures based on the same claims DS On 11 October , Australia requested to join the consultations in the second complaint. This provides an opportunity to present our views to the panel and, if the panel report is appealed, to the Appellate Body. On 18 January , the United States requested consultations with Canada regarding measures maintained by British Columbia governing the sale of wine in grocery stores DS On 1 February , Australia requested to join the consultations. Australia submitted its response to Indonesia's request for a preliminary ruling on 6 January and submitted its third party written submission on 15 January Australia delivered its third party oral statement on 2 February and submitted the executive summary of its third party written submission and third party oral statement on 12 February {/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} Australia and Indonesia have agreed that Australia would have a "reasonable period of time" 8 months from 27 January in which to implement the Panel's findings, with an extension of one month in the event of unavoidable delay. On adoption, Australia committed to ensuring "prompt implementation of the recommendations and rulings of the Dispute Settlement Body within the framework of Australia's anti-dumping system, in a manner consistent with Australia's WTO obligations". On 15 October , Brazil requested the establishment of a panel. Consultations were held on 30 October The first Panel hearing in respect of the dispute took place in Geneva from 18 to 19 December The Panel's report was circulated publicly on 4 December The Panel confirmed that Australia's finding of a "particular market situation" in the Indonesian A4 copy paper market was consistent with the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, but found that Australia acted inconsistently in a specific application of Australia's anti-dumping laws. On 12 July , the Government announced that, together with Brazil and Guatemala, Australia would request that the WTO establish a panel to examine the matter. Canada has now agreed to remove British Columbia's discriminatory measures from 1 November As a result of this agreement, Australia will not proceed with these aspects of its claim. Australia filed its third participant written submission and executive summary on 19 October , and delivered its third participant oral statement on 8 May On 12 February , Chinese Taipei requested consultations with Indonesia regarding a safeguard measure imposed by Indonesia on imports of certain flat-rolled iron or steel products and the investigation and determinations leading thereto. Australia along with 26 other members reserved its third-party rights. The first Panel hearing in respect of the dispute by Australia took place in Geneva from 18 to 19 July Indonesia requested consultations with Australia on 1 September in relation to Australia's imposition of anti-dumping measures on certain imports of A4 copy paper from Indonesia. A panel was established on 25 March On 18 June , the Director-General composed the panel. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}To help Australians avoid difficulties overseas, we maintain travel advisories for more than destinations. On 3 March , the Director-General composed the panel. New Zealand requested consultations with Australia on 31 August in relation to Australia's measures affecting the importation of apples from New Zealand. This dispute is being heard jointly with DS Australia delivered a third party oral submission on 24 February On 30 August the Panel report was circulated to Members. However the dispute has not moved to the next procedural stage of the appointment of panelists. On 20 May a single panel was established to examine these disputes. Consultations were held on 10 November Australia submitted its third party written submission on 8 November , third party oral statement on 27 January , responses to questions on 20 February and Executive Summary on 27 February On 15 December , the United States requested consultations with China concerning China's administration of its tariff rate quotas, including those for wheat, short- and medium- grain rice, long grain rice, and corn. The Panel report was circulated on 17 October At its meeting on 31 August , the DSB established a panel. Australia claimed that the measures appear to be inconsistent with Articles 3. On 1 June , Vietnam requested consultations with Indonesia regarding a safeguard measure imposed by Indonesia on imports of certain flat-rolled iron or steel products and the investigation and determinations leading thereto. On 8 October the Director-General composed the panel. China claimed that the measures are inconsistent with Articles 2. On 13 September , the United States requested consultations with China regarding certain measures concerning domestic support for agricultural producers of wheat, rice and corn. The panels in the three disputes have the same panelists, and the disputes have a harmonised timetable. China subsequently accepted the requests of Australia, Canada, the European Union and Thailand to join the consultations. A Panel has not yet been composed. The Philippines' request for consultations was received on 18 October , and consultations were held in November However, the Philippines has not moved to the next procedural stage of requesting the establishment of a panel. On 12 December , China requested consultations with the European Union regarding certain provisions for determining the normal value of goods from "non-market economy" countries used in anti-dumping proceedings involving products from China. Australia delivered its third party written submission on 26 January, provided an oral submission on 25 February, and submitted an executive summary of comments on 9 March On 31 October , the European Union requested consultations with Russia regarding the tariff treatment that it accords to certain goods in both agricultural and manufacturing sectors. On 15 April , Australia requested to join the consultations. On 5 December , the United States requested the establishment of a panel. The Appellate Body hearing took place in Geneva on 11 and 12 October On 17 August , Australia commenced issuing import permits for apples from New Zealand, consistent with the joint notification of the agreed reasonable period of time by Australia and New Zealand to the Dispute Settlement Body on 31 January Import of New Zealand apples into Australia commenced as of 19 August Australia has informed the WTO Dispute Settlement Body that it has fully implemented the recommendations and rulings in the dispute. Canada subsequently accepted the requests of Argentina, Australia, the European Union and New Zealand to join the consultations. The panel was composed on 4 November On 8 May , New Zealand DS and the United States DS requested consultations with Indonesia concerning its measures on the importation of horticultural products, animals and animal products. On 28 February , the Government announced that Australia, together with Brazil, was launching formal WTO dispute settlement action concerning India's sugar subsidies. Australia submitted its third party written submission on 26 October , and provided a third party oral submission on 19 June On 7 May , the Russian Federation requested consultations with Ukraine regarding anti-dumping measures imposed by Ukraine on imports of ammonium nitrate originating from the Russian Federation. On 22 April a panel was established. Consultations were held on 4 October The panel issued its final report to the parties on 27 May On 15 September , New Zealand filed a cross appeal. Further information on the five current WTO disputes relating to Australia's tobacco plain packaging measure can be found on our tobacco plain packaging page. On 12 January , Australia requested consultations with Canada concerning measures maintained by the Canadian Government and the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia governing the sale of wine. At its meeting on 3 December , the DSB established a panel. Australia filed a third party written submission on 21 November , delivered third party oral statements at the oral hearings on 7 December and 16 May , and filed its executive summary on 3 July On 14 September , Ukraine requested consultations with the Russian Federation regarding various measures prohibiting or otherwise restricting traffic in transit by means of road and rail transport passing through the territory of the Russian Federation and, in particular, such traffic in transit from the territory of Ukraine, and the publication and administration of those measures. In April Australia and Canada reached an agreement with respect to measures in the Canadian province of British Columbia. A panel was established on 23 February On 22 April , the panel was composed. The United States claimed that the measures appear to be inconsistent with Articles 3. The Australian Passport Office and its agents are committed to providing a secure, efficient and responsive passport service for Australia. Australia submitted its response regarding the request for a preliminary ruling and third party written submission on 2 September The Panel report was circulated on 12 August On 16 October , Brazil requested consultations with Indonesia concerning certain measures imposed by Indonesia on the importation of meat from fowls of the species Gallus domesticus and products from fowls of the species Gallus domesticus. On 2 July , Japan requested consultations with Brazil with respect to certain measures concerning taxation and charges in the automotive sector, the electronics and technology industry, and tax advantages for exporters. On 28 September , Brazil notified the DSB of its decision to appeal to the Appellate Body certain issues of law and legal interpretations in the panel report.